Data I’ll never publish 1: flower production and plant size in Lotus corniculatus

Lotus flower production graph 1991

For reasons that will become obvious next week, I’ve been in a reflective mood recently and this first in an occasional series of posts about “data I will never publish” is one of the results of that reflection.

When scientists have been doing research for a few years, most of them start accumulating a back-log of data.  In some cases this is data that may be published in the future (for ecologists that means long-term data sets, which I’ve talked about before) but other data may be fragmentary or simply too limited to be publishable.  Good data are hard won and I never, ever discard data: you never know when it may come in useful.  So in this series I will present such scraps of data that I know I’ll (probably) never publish.  Their purpose is to illustrate interesting points, to stimulate discussion and ideas, and hopefully they might even be of use to other researchers in one way or another (I’m happy to share the raw data, just drop me a line).

This first data set was collected in the grasslands of Wytham Woods in 1991 when I was a research student.  It subsequently ended up being used in my PhD thesis and in one of the papers that resulted from it (Ollerton & Lack 1998) but not quite in this form, rather embedded within larger analyses.  The graph above (click on it for a more detailed view) shows the relationship between individual plant size (measured using a calibrated non-destructive biomass index that I developed) and total flower production for that year, in the plant species Lotus corniculatus (Fabaceae), commonly known as bird’s-foot trefoil.

This plant is a herbaceous perennial grassland species which can live for quite a long time (at least 50 years).   The data show that plant size and flower production can span 5 orders of magnitude – the maximum number of flowers produced in one year by a single plant in this population was over 13,000, which is astonishing for a low-growing grassland species!

I’ve used this figure in undergraduate lectures as it illustrates several important points about many plants:

  • in theory, there is no upper limit to the potential maximum size of plants.  As long as they have appropriate growing conditions and are not limited by weather or disease or herbivory, they will continue growing.  That’s because they are modular, constructed of iterations of basic units of the plant “body”, and show indeterminate growth.
  • likewise, there is no upper limit to the number of flowers that can be produced because each modular unit can itself produce one or more flowers.
  • plants can be very plastic in their response to the environment.  The data form two clusters; the lower one (smaller plants) is from a sub-population that grew in a grassland that had never been fertilised.  The upper cluster (larger plants) grew in an adjacent area that had previously been an arable field and in which there were still fertiliser residues present in the soil.  The smaller plants are likely to have been older than the larger plants, but the latter had more soil nutrients on which to draw.

The following graph illustrates the same plants but this time it’s the relationship between biomass and number of seed pods produced.  Still a linear relationship with no sign of a plateau; female reproduction in these plants just goes on and on (as, of course, does male function via pollen dispersal.

Lotus seed pod production graph 1991

This is one of the things that I love about plants: they are so flexible in their response to growing conditions!



Filed under Biodiversity, Pollination

6 responses to “Data I’ll never publish 1: flower production and plant size in Lotus corniculatus

  1. Clem

    You have flower and seed pod counts for the same plants in these datasets? If so, would it be possible to calculate a flower abortion rate and see if abortion (or alternatively, pod set) is affected differently than either total flowers or total pods? There is a fair literature around environmental influence on soybean pod setting (or flower abortion). It might be worth a look for bird’s-foot trefoil if the data are at hand.

    I do want to quibble about there being no theoretical upper limit to the potential size of a plant. Even plants with indeterminate habit will run afoul of physical restraints eventually. Clonal aspen stands are extremely large – but even these have not outgrown the continent they exist on.


    • Hi Clem,

      Yes, all the data points refer to individual plants, some of which were followed for three years. So yes it would be possible to calculate flower abortion and seed set.

      Your last point is well taken; I should have used more nuanced language 🙂


  2. Steve Hawkins

    Intrigued to know how you measure, non-destructively, the biomass of individual plants?

    Fascinating that plants that we rather tend to take for granted with just a few good flowers open at a time, produce so many over a season!

    Admire your patience in counting them all!


    • I’d have to go back to my thesis to check the details (which I don’t have to hand) but roughly the approach was to estimate the number of stems and multiply it by the product of average stem length, average number of leaves per stem, and average leaf length. At the end of the season I harvested a sample of plants and calculated dry weight, then looked at the correlation with my index. It was very close, R-Sqr greater than 0.9.

      Yes, it’s often the plants that we overlook that surprise us!


  3. Pingback: Gull use of urban parks in winter – data I’ll never publish (2) | Jeff Ollerton's Biodiversity Blog

  4. Pingback: Data I am never going to publish in peer-reviewed journals | Don't Forget the Roundabouts

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s